---
title: GP4 GUST – Romania
description: "# GP1 Title: GUST – Someș Urban Garden Transilvania ## Citizen-Led Community Gardening and Urban Nature-Based Learning in Cluj-Napoca **Location:** Cluj-Napoca, Romania – near the Someș River, Canalul Morii and Parcul Rozelor **Main source:** Sustainably Organized Society – Community Gardening…"
url: "https://becom4.eu/becomdocs/gp4-gust-romania/"
updated: "2026-09-19"
category: "Community Gardening / CG - Good practical examples"
---

# GP4 GUST – Romania

# GP1 Title: GUST – Someș Urban Garden Transilvania

## Citizen-Led Community Gardening and Urban Nature-Based Learning in Cluj-Napoca

**Location:** Cluj-Napoca, Romania – near the Someș River, Canalul Morii and Parcul Rozelor

**Main source:** Sustainably Organized Society – Community Gardening (S.O.S) [https://sustenabilorg.ro/gradinarit-comunitar/](https://sustenabilorg.ro/gradinarit-comunitar/)

**Additional source:**

- [https://www.fundatiacomunitaracluj.ro/in-zona-ta/grila-proiecte-editie-pilot-2025-in-zona-ta/gradinarit-comunitar-in-zona-ta/](https://www.fundatiacomunitaracluj.ro/in-zona-ta/grila-proiecte-editie-pilot-2025-in-zona-ta/gradinarit-comunitar-in-zona-ta/)
- [https://www.clujlife.com/eveniment/1-mai-gradinaresc/](https://www.clujlife.com/eveniment/1-mai-gradinaresc/)
- [https://www.transilvaniabusiness.ro/2026/01/21/a-aparut-reteaua-gradinilor-comunitare/](https://www.transilvaniabusiness.ro/2026/01/21/a-aparut-reteaua-gradinilor-comunitare/)
- [https://gradinicomunitare.ro/harta/](https://gradinicomunitare.ro/harta/)
- Photos and videos: [https://gradinirevendicate.ro/](https://gradinirevendicate.ro/)

![](https://becom4.eu/wp-content/uploads/word-image-2989-3.jpeg)

# Introduction

**GUST – Grădina Urbană Someșeană Transilvania** is a pilot community garden developed in Cluj-Napoca by the **Societatea Organizată Sustenabil (S.O.S.)**, together with residents living near the area and other civic activists. The garden was established in **July 2023** as a practical demonstration of how community gardening could be introduced and developed within the urban environment.

The initiative emerged from concerns about the disappearance of informal gardens as urban development and new infrastructure projects transformed green spaces. Before the creation of GUST, civic actors had already been working to draw attention to informal gardens along the Someș and to promote their preservation and recognition.

The site has an important local history. Residents had been cultivating vegetables in the area for decades; historical accounts indicate that local cultivation activities began as early as **1984**. The area was previously associated with the Agronomic Institute in Cluj and had been used as a feed-storage area for a teaching farm.

GUST therefore does not represent the creation of a completely new practice. Instead, it builds upon **existing local gardening knowledge and community use of urban land**, transforming an informal practice into a visible pilot for community gardening.

The garden has been accepted by the municipality as part of the development and extension of the Rozelor Park area, although the involvement of the municipality has remained limited. The pilot has consequently been used by civic organisations to demonstrate the potential of community gardening and to advocate for a broader local framework.

An important dimension of the GUST experience is its connection with public policy. S.O.S., together with other partners, contributed to a proposal for a local public policy on community gardens within the Cluj Metropolitan Area. The policy proposal was developed through a participatory process and addresses community gardens as **nature-based solutions, tools for urban regeneration, ways of connecting communities with nature and components of green infrastructure.**

GUST is therefore more than a place where vegetables are grown. It functions as a **living laboratory for sustainable urban development**, combining community participation, local knowledge, environmental action, social interaction, food production, education and policy innovation.

![](https://becom4.eu/wp-content/uploads/word-image-2989-4.jpeg)

### Context

GUST demonstrates how a relatively small community-led intervention can connect several dimensions of urban sustainability.

The initiative connects:

- urban gardening;
- protection of green spaces;
- local food production;
- nature-based solutions;
- community participation;
- intergenerational knowledge exchange;
- environmental awareness;
- civic engagement;
- public-policy development;
- informal and experiential learning.

The garden has also been promoted as a space for**meeting between generations, knowledge exchange, observation and learning.** Its location makes it particularly suitable for connecting everyday urban life with environmental and sustainability education.

### Learning Objectives

- Understand how community gardening can function as a nature-based solution in an urban environment.
- Analyse how an informal local practice can be transformed into a community-led pilot initiative.
- Identify the environmental, social, political, economic and educational dimensions of community gardening.
- Understand the role of citizens and civic organisations in developing local public-policy proposals.
- Explore how community gardens can become places for intergenerational and experiential learning.
- Develop ideas for transferring the GUST approach to another neighbourhood, city or community.
- Design a basic implementation plan for a local community garden.

### Session Plan

- **Introduction to community gardening and urban sustainability – 15 min**

Introduction to community gardens as nature-based solutions and examples of urban food-growing spaces.

- **Case study analysis: GUST – Cluj-Napoca – 30 min**

Presentation of the GUST initiative, its local context, stakeholders, challenges and potential for replication.

- **Workshop: Designing a community garden for a local community – 45 min**

Participants identify a potential site and develop a basic model covering environmental, social, political, economic and educational functions.

- **Reflection and feedback – 30 min**

Participants discuss what elements of GUST could be transferred to their own locality and what would need to be adapted.

# NEB Principles Identified in the Example

### Sustainability

Sustainability is central to GUST because the initiative promotes community gardening as a **nature-based solution** and as a way of maintaining and activating urban green spaces. The wider policy proposal developed in Cluj connects community gardens with urban regeneration, green infrastructure and reconnection between communities and nature. The initiative also proposes the use of community composting as a way of processing plant residues locally and transforming organic waste into a natural fertiliser for the garden.

### Inclusion

GUST creates a shared space where residents can meet, work together and exchange knowledge. The initiative is explicitly described as a potential meeting place between generations and as a space for knowledge exchange and learning. Community gardening can therefore provide a relatively accessible form of participation that connects people through a common practical activity.

### Aesthetics

The aesthetic dimension is expressed through the transformation and care of an urban green space and through the relationship between gardening, nature and the surrounding public space. A community garden can contribute to people's perception of their neighbourhood by transforming a functional or underused space into a place associated with food, plants, social interaction and care. In the NEB context, this dimension is important because sustainability is not considered separately from the quality of people's everyday experience.

![](https://becom4.eu/wp-content/uploads/word-image-2989-5.jpeg)

### What the Sectors Can Learn: Community Gardening (QHM-Oriented)

# Environment

GUST demonstrates that community gardening can function as a **nature-based solution for urban areas**, connecting green infrastructure, food growing, biodiversity and community stewardship. The Cluj policy proposal specifically identifies community gardening as a way to connect communities with nature and strengthen urban green infrastructure.

### Community gardens can protect and activate urban green infrastructure

**Lesson:** Urban green spaces can provide ecological, social and food-production functions simultaneously. GUST demonstrates how a community garden can maintain a productive relationship between citizens and an urban green area.

**Adaptation:** Cities and communities should identify existing informal gardens and underused green spaces as potential community assets instead of considering them only as spaces awaiting conventional development.

**Example Implementation:** A municipality can map informal and underused gardens and identify those with potential to become community-managed gardens.

**Practical Step:** Create a local map of informal and underused green spaces and assess ownership, accessibility, environmental condition and community interest before selecting potential pilot sites.

### Community composting can close local organic-resource loops

**Lesson:** GUST has been identified as a suitable location for a community composting station where plant residues could be transformed locally into natural fertiliser. This demonstrates how gardening can be connected with circular management of organic resources.

**Adaptation:** Community gardens can integrate composting into their management model and use garden residues as a resource rather than treating them as waste.

**Example Implementation:** Establish a small community composting station connected directly to garden activities.

**Practical Step:** Identify the types and quantities of organic residues generated by the garden and design a simple composting system appropriate to the available space.

### Local food production reconnects citizens with nature

**Lesson:** GUST demonstrates how growing vegetables in an urban environment can reconnect residents with food production and natural processes.

**Adaptation:** Urban sustainability programmes should include practical food-growing activities rather than relying exclusively on awareness campaigns.

**Example Implementation:** Create seasonal planting and harvesting activities involving residents, schools and community organisations.

**Practical Step:** Develop a simple annual gardening calendar showing planting, maintenance, harvesting and biodiversity activities.

# Society

GUST demonstrates that community gardening can create a **shared civic space** where people meet, exchange knowledge and participate in a common activity.

### Community gardening creates opportunities for intergenerational knowledge exchange

**Lesson:** GUST is intended as a meeting place between generations and as a space for knowledge exchange and learning.

The history of the site also demonstrates the value of local knowledge: people who have cultivated gardens in the area for decades possess practical knowledge that can be shared with newer generations.

**Adaptation:** Community gardens should actively recognise older residents and experienced gardeners as knowledge holders.

**Example Implementation:**Organise seasonal sessions where experienced gardeners demonstrate traditional cultivation methods to young people and new participants.

**Practical Step:** Organise at least two intergenerational gardening sessions during each growing season and document the knowledge shared.

### Shared practical activities strengthen community connections

**Lesson:** Working together on a garden provides an accessible reason for residents to interact and cooperate.

**Adaptation:** Community organisations can use gardening activities as an entry point for wider community participation.

**Example Implementation:** Combine gardening sessions with community meals, open-garden events, workshops or neighbourhood activities.

**Practical Step:** Schedule one open community activity each month during the gardening season and invite residents beyond the regular gardening group.

### Community participation can transform a local space into a civic asset

**Lesson:** GUST was created together with residents and civic activists, demonstrating the potential of citizen involvement in shaping local green spaces.

**Adaptation:** Local development projects should involve potential users in the planning and management of community spaces.

**Example Implementation:** Use participatory workshops to decide how a garden should be organised, what activities should take place and how responsibilities should be distributed.

**Practical Step:** Before developing a new garden, organise a participatory meeting with residents and document their priorities and proposed solutions.

# Politics

GUST provides an important lesson about the relationship between **grassroots initiatives and public policy.**

### Pilot projects can provide evidence for public-policy development

**Lesson:** GUST was created as a pilot to demonstrate how community gardening could work in practice, while the organisations involved also contributed to a local public-policy proposal for community gardens.

**Adaptation:** Instead of waiting for a complete policy framework before testing new approaches, municipalities can support small pilots and use their results to develop appropriate regulations.

**Example Implementation:** Launch several community-garden pilots, monitor their results and use the evidence to develop a local regulatory framework.

**Practical Step:** Prepare a short pilot evaluation containing participation, environmental, social and educational results and use it as evidence in discussions with local authorities.

### Civic organisations can contribute to policy innovation

**Lesson:** The Cluj experience shows that public policy can emerge from collaboration between civic organisations, residents and actors connected to local administration. The policy proposal was developed as a participatory process involving several organisations and institutions.

**Adaptation:** Cities should create channels through which community organisations can propose, test and evaluate new local approaches.

**Example Implementation:** Establish a municipal working group involving representatives of community gardens, NGOs, residents, educational organisations and relevant municipal departments.

**Practical Step:** Identify the relevant local authority and request a formal meeting to present the pilot, evidence and proposed framework for replication.

### Formal recognition is important for long-term development

**Lesson:** The GUST experience also demonstrates the challenge of scaling community gardening when a broader regulatory framework is not yet established. S.O.S. notes that further efforts are needed to scale the practice throughout the city.

**Adaptation:** Successful community pilots should be followed by clear rules concerning land access, responsibilities, maintenance and community participation.

**Example Implementation:** Develop a municipal community-gardening regulation defining eligible spaces, participation rules and responsibilities.

**Practical Step:** Create a stakeholder group to identify the legal and administrative barriers that need to be addressed before scaling the model.

# Economy

GUST demonstrates an alternative form of urban value creation in which the main benefit is not commercial profit but **shared social, environmental and food-related value.**

### Urban gardening can create value from existing spaces

**Lesson:**Community gardening can increase the social and practical value of urban land without requiring the transformation of the site into a conventional commercial development.

**Adaptation:** Cities should consider community gardens as low-cost interventions capable of producing environmental, social and educational benefits.

**Example Implementation:** Make suitable public or underused spaces available for community gardening through transparent local programmes.

**Practical Step:** Identify underused spaces and calculate the potential costs and benefits of converting selected sites into community gardens.

### Community gardens can support local food resilience

**Lesson:** GUST demonstrates how residents can participate directly in growing vegetables and herbs within the city. Local food production can strengthen people's connection with food systems and increase awareness of seasonal and locally produced food.

**Adaptation:**Urban sustainability programmes can integrate food-growing activities with local food education.

**Example Implementation:** Organise seasonal harvesting, food preparation and food-waste prevention activities around the garden.

**Practical Step:** Identify local partners such as schools, community organisations, markets or food-related businesses that could participate in a seasonal food event.

### Community gardening can stimulate local partnerships

**Lesson:** A community garden can become a meeting point between civic organisations, residents, educational institutions, businesses and public authorities.

**Adaptation:** Local businesses can contribute materials, expertise, volunteering or sponsorship without changing the community character of the garden.

**Example Implementation:** Create a local partnership programme in which businesses support seeds, tools, composting equipment or educational activities.

**Practical Step:** Prepare a one-page partnership proposal identifying what the garden needs and what businesses can contribute.

# Education

Education is a central potential of GUST. The garden is described as a place of **observation and learning**, while its community dimension creates opportunities for knowledge exchange between generations.

### Community gardens create experiential learning environments

**Lesson:** GUST demonstrates that sustainability can be learned through direct interaction with plants, soil, food and other people rather than only through classroom instruction.

**Adaptation:** Schools and adult education providers can use community gardens as outdoor learning laboratories.

**Example Implementation:** Develop learning activities around planting, soil, biodiversity, composting, water, food systems and climate change.

**Practical Step:** Select one curriculum topic and design a 60–90 minute outdoor learning activity using the garden as the learning environment.

### Local knowledge can become an educational resource

**Lesson:** The history of gardening in the area provides an opportunity to preserve and transmit local knowledge.

**Adaptation:** Educational programmes should combine scientific information with knowledge held by local residents and experienced gardeners.

**Example Implementation:** Create a “Garden Stories” activity in which older residents document how the area was cultivated in the past.

**Practical Step:** Interview at least three experienced local gardeners and record their knowledge about traditional plants, techniques and seasonal practices.

### Community gardening can develop transversal skills

**Lesson:** Gardening requires communication, teamwork, planning, problem solving, responsibility and cooperation.

**Adaptation:** Community gardens can be used for developing both environmental competencies and socio-emotional skills.

**Example Implementation:** Assign learners small group responsibilities such as planning a garden bed, managing compost, monitoring water use or organising an event.

**Practical Step:** Create a group task in which learners must design and implement one small element of the garden and present what they learned.

### Community gardens can connect formal and informal education

**Lesson:** A garden can bring together schools, families, residents, NGOs and specialists in one learning environment.

**Adaptation:** Educational institutions can establish partnerships with community gardens rather than treating learning as something that takes place only inside the institution.

**Example Implementation:** Create a seasonal school–community garden programme covering planting, maintenance, harvesting and reflection.

**Practical Step:** Contact one nearby school or adult education provider and pilot one gardening-based learning activity before developing a longer partnership.

# Practical Steps for Implementation

To transfer the GUST model to another locality:

- **Identify a founding community group** willing to take responsibility for the pilot.
- **Map existing informal gardens and underused green spaces** in the neighbourhood.
- **Assess land ownership, accessibility and environmental conditions** before selecting a site.
- **Identify local residents with gardening experience** and involve them as knowledge holders.
- **Engage the relevant local authority at an early stage** and clarify the legal and administrative conditions for using the space.
- **Develop a simple co-design process** involving residents and potential users.
- **Start with a small pilot** before attempting city-wide implementation.
- **Create basic rules** covering cultivation methods, shared spaces, maintenance and responsibilities.
- **Include circular practices**, particularly composting and responsible use of water and materials.
- **Develop educational activities** for children, young people, adults and older residents.
- **Organise public events** to make the garden visible to the wider community.
- **Document the process and results** through photographs, participation data, stories and learning outcomes.
- **Evaluate the pilot** from environmental, social, political, economic and educational perspectives.
- **Use the evidence to develop policy recommendations** for wider implementation.
- **Create partnerships** with schools, NGOs, universities, businesses and public authorities.
- **Develop a sustainable management and funding model** before scaling the initiative.

# Transferability

The GUST model is transferable to:

- municipalities seeking low-cost nature-based solutions;
- neighbourhoods with informal or underused gardens;
- citizen groups and environmental NGOs;
- schools and adult education organisations;
- universities and research institutions;
- social organisations working on community participation;
- local authorities developing green infrastructure;
- cities interested in community-gardening policies;
- organisations promoting local food systems and circular economy;
- communities seeking intergenerational learning opportunities.

The model is particularly suitable for places where there are **existing informal gardening practices, unused or underused green spaces, active residents and organisations willing to facilitate community participation**. However, transfer should focus on the **principles and process**, not on copying the physical design of GUST. Each locality should adapt the model to its land ownership, legal framework, environmental conditions, community structure and available resources.

The most important lesson from GUST is that a community garden can become much more than a place for growing food. **A community garden can be:** an environmental solution; a social meeting place; a laboratory for local policy; a generator of shared local value; an outdoor learning environment. GUST demonstrates how a **small, locally rooted initiative can generate knowledge that informs wider urban development.**

# GP2 Title: Urban Regeneration and Community Gardening at the Butcher’s Bastion

**Location:**Baia Mare, Maramureș County

**Main source:** Museum of History and Archaeology Maramureș – Official Portal (Butcher’s Bastion Section): [https://www.muzeubaiamare.ro/category/bastionul-macelarilor-baia-mare/](https://www.muzeubaiamare.ro/category/bastionul-macelarilor-baia-mare/)

**Additional sources:**

- National Heritage Institute (cIMeC) – Cultural Heritage Database: *Bastionul Măcelarilor din Baia Mare (Fișă de monument).* Available at: [http://ghidulmuzeelor.cimec.ro/id.asp?k=2114](https://www.google.com/search?q=http://ghidulmuzeelor.cimec.ro/id.asp%3Fk%3D2114)
- Baia Mare City Hall – Official Tourism & Heritage Portal: *Atractii Turistice: Bastionul Măcelarilor.* Available at: [https://www.baiamare.ro/ro/Descopera-Baia-Mare/Obiective-turistice-si-atractii/Atractii-turistice/Bastionul-Macelarilor/](https://www.baiamare.ro/ro/Descopera-Baia-Mare/Obiective-turistice-si-atractii/Atractii-turistice/Bastionul-Macelarilor/)
- Kacsó, Carol (2011). *Repertoriul arheologic al județului Maramureș* (2nd edition). Baia Mare: Editura Bibliotheca Marmatia.
- European Commission. *New European Bauhaus: Beautiful, Sustainable, Together.* Official Policy Framework. Available at: [https://new-european-bauhaus.europa.eu/index_en](https://new-european-bauhaus.europa.eu/index_en)
- Mihali, Nicoară & Mihail, Tudor (2003). *Pintea Viteazul. Oșteanul de la Baia*. Editura Proema (For historical context regarding the 1703 events at the South Gate).
- Photos: [https://www.facebook.com/BastionulMacelarilorBM/photos](https://www.facebook.com/BastionulMacelarilorBM/photos), [https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61572356025551&sk=photos](https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61572356025551&sk=photos)

![C:\\Users\\alexa\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\Windows\\INetCache\\Content.Word\\3.jpg](https://becom4.eu/wp-content/uploads/c-users-alexa-appdata-local-microsoft-windows-ine.jpeg)

# Introduction

The Butcher’s Bastion (*Bastionul Măcelarilor*), also known historically as the Munitions Tower (*Turnul Munițiilor*), is the only fully preserved tower in the medieval fortification system of Baia Mare, located in Maramureș County, Romania. Originally erected around 1547 under the rule of Gașpar Drágfi to guard the city’s South Gate (*Poarta Maghiară*), the circular stone structure embodies the strategic and economic significance of Baia Mare as a free royal town famous for its rich gold and silver deposits. Entrusted to the Guild of Butchers, one of the wealthiest and most influential medieval guilds in the region, the bastion served both a defensive function and a symbolic role in civic responsibility.

Over the centuries, the site became closely linked to local identity, most notably defined by the events of August 1703, when the famous anti-Habsburg outlaw Pintea Viteazul was killed in an ambush near its gates. Following extensive restoration works between 2009 and 2011 funded by European development programs, the monument was integrated into the public circuit as an external department of the County Museum of History and Archaeology Maramureș. Today, the bastion hosts cultural exhibitions, craft workshops (such as weaving and pottery), and seasonal community meetings, bridging historical memory with contemporary social life.

Despite its successful architectural conservation, the Butcher’s Bastion functions within a dense urban ecosystem defined by high traffic, environmental pollution, and proximity to the city’s primary food market (*Piața Izvoarele*). This spatial context creates a pressing requirement for accessible green spaces that foster urban biodiversity, social cohesion, and environmental education. In reaction to these challenges, the concept of a community garden, an integrated "Living Garden" (*Grădina Vie*), provides an innovative framework for transforming the bastion’s courtyard into an active agro-cultural and eco-social hub.

This Good Practice project explores how the principles of community gardening, urban permaculture, and circular economy can be applied to a Class A historical monument. Rather than treating the medieval tower as a static museum piece, the initiative envisions the site as an adaptive, living organism where heritage preservation and ecological regeneration reinforce one another. By introducing non-invasive, raised wooden planting beds, rain-harvesting systems, and organic composting infrastructure, the project creates an open space where residents, elderly citizens, students, and local artisans can cooperate to cultivate heirloom crops, medicinal herbs, and plants associated with traditional Maramureș crafts.

### Context

The Butcher’s Bastion demonstrates **how a historic heritage site can be transformed into a living, multifunctional community space without compromising its historical character.**The initiative therefore does **not replace the cultural function of the Bastion**. It adds a new layer to it: the historic site becomes a place where people can experience **history, nature, community and learning together.**

The proposed garden combines:

- heritage preservation – respecting the medieval structure and archaeological layers;
- urban greening – introducing plants and biodiversity;
- community gardening – creating opportunities for residents to participate;
- circular economy – composting organic residues and using rainwater;
- traditional knowledge – connecting plants with local crafts and natural dyes;
- education – creating opportunities for schools and intergenerational learning.

### Learning Objectives

- Understand how a historical heritage site can be connected with sustainable urban development and community gardening.
- Identify the main NEB principles present in the example: sustainability, inclusion and quality of experience/aesthetics.
- Recognise how community gardening can contribute to biodiversity, urban greening and circular resource management.
- Explain how low-impact and reversible interventions can be used in protected heritage environments without damaging archaeological or historical features.
- Analyse how the “Living Garden” concept connects heritage, environment, community, traditional knowledge and education.
- Identify opportunities for intergenerational learning through gardening, traditional crafts, seeds and local knowledge.
- Understand how composting, rainwater harvesting and reuse of organic resources can support circular-economy practices.
- Explore how museums, local authorities, residents, schools, NGOs and local artisans can collaborate in the management of a community space.
- Develop ideas for adapting the Butcher’s Bastion model to other historic buildings, courtyards or protected urban spaces.
- Design a basic implementation plan for a heritage-based community garden, taking into account environmental, social, cultural, educational and heritage-protection requirements.

### Session Plan

- Introduction to heritage, community gardening and urban sustainability – 15 min

Introduction to the relationship between cultural heritage, urban greening and community gardening, using the Butcher’s Bastion as an example of how a historic site can become a living and sustainable community space.

- Case study analysis: Butcher’s Bastion – Baia Mare – 30 min

Presentation of the Butcher’s Bastion, its historical and urban context, the “Living Garden” concept, proposed stakeholders, environmental challenges and opportunities for combining heritage conservation, community gardening, biodiversity and circular practices.

- Workshop: Designing a “Living Garden” for a heritage site – 45 min

Participants identify a historical or culturally significant site in their own locality and develop a basic model for a community garden, considering heritage protection, environmental sustainability, social participation, local partnerships and educational activities.

- Reflection and feedback – 30 min

Participants discuss which elements of the Butcher’s Bastion “Living Garden” model could be transferred to their own locality, what adaptations would be necessary, and how heritage, nature, community and education could be connected.

## NEB Principles Identified in the Example

The community gardening project at the Butcher’s Bastion demonstrates comprehensive alignment with the core values of the New European Bauhaus (NEB) by integrating sustainability, social inclusion, and aesthetics into the revitalization of a Class A historical monument.

### Sustainability

From a sustainability perspective, the initiative directly integrates circular economic practices into the site's physical and social management. By introducing non-invasive, raised wooden planting beds (*raised beds*), the project avoids disturbing the underlying archaeological layers while encouraging urban permaculture. The garden prioritizes renewable and compostable materials, reliance on local heirloom seeds (*Seed Sharing*), rainwater harvesting from the annex roofs, and organic composting of green waste sourced both from the garden and the neighboring municipal market. This closed-loop resource management lowers environmental impact, lowers dependence on synthetic inputs, and improves urban biodiversity by attracting key pollinators like bees and butterflies to a dense, asphalt-heavy urban area.

### Inclusion

In terms of inclusion, the project positions social equity and civic co-creation at its center. By granting a shared, accessible green space adjacent to a busy commercial district, the initiative bridges generational and social divides. Residents, particularly elderly individuals living in nearby apartment blocks with limited access to nature, are invited to participate through programs like "Adopt a Bed" alongside students and volunteers. Furthermore, the garden functions as a platform for intergenerational knowledge transfer, where customary ecological wisdom regarding native herbs and dye plants is preserved and shared alongside workshops hosted by local artisans. The site transforms from a static historical enclosure into a participatory civic hub that reinforces social cohesion, belonging, and collective stewardship.

### Aesthetics

The NEB framework's aesthetic dimension is clearly reflected in the balanced integration of natural elements with medieval stone architecture. The warm textures of local timber, vivid greenery, and aromatic plant displays soften the massive volcanic rock walls of the 16th-century fortification, creating a multisensory refuge in the heart of Baia Mare. Beauty is approached not as a superficial ornament, but as an agent for emotional connection: by making sustainable living visually attractive and experiential, the garden stimulates a deeper public appreciation for both built heritage and nature-based solutions. In doing so, the Butcher’s Bastion demonstrates how historical preservation and ecological innovation can merge to enhance the quality of life in contemporary cities.

![](https://becom4.eu/wp-content/uploads/word-image-2989-7.jpeg)

### What the Sectors Can Learn: Community Gardening (QHM-Oriented)

# Environment

The Butcher’s Bastion example demonstrates that environmental regeneration in dense urban heritage areas does not necessarily require heavy infrastructure or invasive interventions. **Low-impact community gardening, nature-based solutions and urban permaculture** can introduce ecological functions while respecting archaeological and structural constraints. Raised wooden beds and vertical growing systems allow cultivation on paved or historic surfaces without excavating or damaging underlying archaeological layers.

### Community gardening as a low-impact nature-based solution in heritage areas

**Lesson:** The Butcher’s Bastion example demonstrates that **community gardening can contribute to environmental regeneration in protected heritage areas without compromising their historical and archaeological value**. This approach shows that **heritage conservation and environmental sustainability can coexist,** allowing historic urban spaces to support biodiversity, community participation and ecological learning while preserving their cultural identy.

**Adaptation:** Other historic centres, museums, fortifications and protected urban spaces can introduce community gardening through reversible, modular and non-invasive systems. The approach can be adapted to sites where conventional planting directly into the ground is impossible or undesirable.

**Example Implementation:** A historic courtyard can be equipped with raised planting beds, vertical containers and mobile planters. The garden can include native plants, aromatic herbs, heirloom varieties and pollinator-friendly species while maintaining clear protection zones around historic structures.

**Practical Step:** Before implementing the garden, conduct a micro-site assessment covering heritage restrictions, sunlight, water availability, existing surfaces, potential contamination and areas where gardening can safely take place.

### Urban community gardens as biodiversity and micro-climate refuges

**Lesson:** The proposed garden can transform a relatively sealed urban courtyard into a **small biodiversity refuge**. In the context of the Bastion, located near traffic and a busy market, vegetation can contribute to creating a greener micro-environment and provide habitats and food resources for pollinators and other urban species. The proposed use of native and drought-tolerant plants also supports biodiversity while reducing maintenance and water requirements.

**Adaptation:** Community gardens in dense urban areas can be designed not only for food production but also as **small ecological stepping stones**connecting fragmented green spaces.

**Example Implementation:** A garden can combine vegetables and herbs with flowering native plants, aromatic species and other plants selected to support pollinators throughout the growing season.

**Practical Step:** Create a **biodiversity-oriented planting plan**, identifying native, drought-tolerant and pollinator-friendly species appropriate to the local environment.

### Connecting biodiversity with local cultural heritage

**Lesson:** The Butcher’s Bastion model demonstrates that environmental restoration can be connected with **local cultural memory and traditional practices.** The proposed planting of species associated with natural dyes creates a direct link between biodiversity, gardening and the Bastion's craft and educational activities.

**Adaptation:** Other heritage gardens can select plants according to their historical, cultural or traditional significance, creating a stronger relationship between environmental protection and local identity.

**Example Implementation:** A heritage garden could cultivate plants historically used for natural dyes, traditional medicine, food or crafts and incorporate them into educational workshops.

**Practical Step:** Identify **3–5 locally significant plant species** and research their ecological, historical and cultural uses before including them in the garden.

### Closing local organic-resource loops through composting

**Lesson:** The Butcher’s Bastion example demonstrates how community gardening can contribute to the **circular use of organic resources**. Organic residues from the garden and potentially from the neighbouring market can be composted and transformed into a useful soil amendment instead of becoming waste.

**Adaptation:** Other community gardens can establish small-scale composting systems and partnerships with nearby markets, households, restaurants or other producers of suitable organic waste.

**Example Implementation:** A community garden establishes an aerobic composting area and works with nearby market vendors to collect suitable plant-based organic residues.

**Practical Step:** Identify a nearby source of organic waste, establish **what materials can be accepted**, and develop a simple collection and compost-management procedure.

### Rainwater harvesting and efficient water management

**Lesson:** The proposed model demonstrates how rainwater can become a local resource for community gardens. Collecting rainwater from existing roof surfaces can reduce reliance on mains water and support efficient irrigation.

**Adaptation:** Historic buildings and community facilities with suitable roof structures can investigate rainwater collection systems, provided these are compatible with heritage-protection requirements.

**Example Implementation:** Rainwater collected from the annex roofs is stored in appropriate containers and used through a low-water drip-irrigation system for the raised beds.

**Practical Step:** Assess the available roof area and seasonal rainfall and calculate the **potential rainwater collection capacity** before selecting storage and irrigation equipment.

### A low-impact model that can be transferred to other places

**Lesson:** One of the strongest lessons from the Butcher’s Bastion example is the **transferability of a modular, low-impact approach**. Community gardens can be introduced even in places where conventional ground-based gardening is restricted by heritage, spatial or environmental conditions.

**Adaptation:** Historic centres, industrial heritage sites, museums, schools and other land-constrained urban areas can adapt the model using locally appropriate materials, plants, water systems and community partnerships.

**Example Implementation:** A municipality or cultural institution selects an underused historic courtyard and establishes a small pilot using raised beds, composting, rainwater collection and biodiversity-friendly planting.

**Practical Step:** Begin with a **small pilot garden**, monitor its environmental results and community participation, and use the experience to determine whether the model can be expanded or replicated elsewhere.

# Society

From a social perspective, the community garden program at the Butcher’s Bastion demonstrates how heritage sites can function as vital catalysts for social inclusion, civic engagement, and long-term community resilience. A central lesson from this model is that eco-friendly urban transformation is most effective when it directly engages the different populations living within the immediate vicinity of historical landmarks.

### Community gardening as a catalyst for social inclusion and community resilience

**Lesson:** By providing accessible opportunities for residents to garden, meet and participate in collective activities, the garden can help reduce social isolation, encourage active participation and strengthen people's connection with their neighbourhood. The proposed model particularly highlights the potential to involve older residents who may have limited access to private green spaces.

**Adaptation:** Other historic sites and public spaces can be transformed into inclusive community environments by providing **low-barrier participation opportunities,** accessible raised beds, suitable pathways and shared gardening activities for different age groups and abilities.

**Example Implementation:** A heritage courtyard could provide shared raised beds that are accessible to older people and people with reduced mobility. Regular gardening sessions could bring together residents, volunteers and community organisations.

**Practical Step:** Conduct a **participatory neighbourhood assessment**to identify local social needs, potential participants and barriers to participation, and use the results to design an inclusive community-garden programme.

### Intergenerational gardening as a way of preserving local knowledge

**Lesson:** The Butcher’s Bastion model demonstrates how community gardening can create a space for **intergenerational knowledge exchange,** connecting older residents, local artisans, museum staff and younger generations. Knowledge about plants, traditional gardening practices, medicinal herbs and natural dyes can be transmitted through practical activities rather than remaining only as historical information.

**Adaptation:** Other heritage and community gardens can involve older residents and local knowledge holders as **active contributors and mentors**, creating opportunities for younger people to learn through direct interaction.

**Example Implementation:** An intergenerational workshop could bring together older gardeners, artisans, students and volunteers to explore traditional plants, seed varieties, medicinal herbs or natural dyeing techniques.

**Practical Step:** Identify local knowledge holders and organise a **“Generations in the Garden”**workshop in which participants share and document traditional gardening and plant-related knowledge.

### Community gardening as a tool for civic participation and ownership

**Lesson:** The proposed Butcher’s Bastion model shows that community participation can extend beyond simply visiting a heritage site. Activities such as **“Adopt a Bed,” seed exchanges and collective harvesting** can give residents an active role in caring for the space and encourage a sense of collective responsibility.

**Adaptation:** Other heritage sites can introduce participatory management mechanisms that allow residents to contribute to decisions, maintenance and activities.

**Example Implementation:** Different residents, schools or community groups could adopt individual planting beds and participate in their maintenance throughout the growing season.

**Practical Step:** Develop a simple **community participation and co-management plan** defining how people can join, what responsibilities they have and how decisions about the garden are made.

### Community gardening as a space for wellbeing and social connection

**Lesson:** The proposed garden demonstrates how combining gardening, heritage and community activities can create opportunities for **social interaction, active participation and everyday contact with nature**. Rather than treating heritage as something that is only observed, the garden can make the site part of people's everyday community life.

**Adaptation:** Cultural institutions and municipalities can use community gardens to complement existing heritage activities with regular social and recreational opportunities.

**Example Implementation:** The garden could host seasonal gardening sessions, community gatherings, seed exchanges, craft workshops and collective harvest events.

**Practical Step:** Create an **annual community activity calendar** that includes regular gardening sessions and at least several intergenerational or community-wide events.

![C:\\Users\\alexa\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\Windows\\INetCache\\Content.Word\\5.jpg](https://becom4.eu/wp-content/uploads/c-users-alexa-appdata-local-microsoft-windows-ine-1.jpeg)

![](https://becom4.eu/wp-content/uploads/word-image-2989-9.jpeg)

# Politics

The Butcher’s Bastion example demonstrates that **community gardening can become a practical mechanism for participatory local governance**, bringing together heritage protection, environmental sustainability and community involvement. The central lesson is that**heritage sites can become spaces not only for cultural preservation, but also for participatory decision-making and collaborative urban development.**

### Heritage-led community gardening as a model for participatory local governance

**Lesson:** The Butcher’s Bastion example demonstrates that community gardening in a heritage site can become a **tool for participatory governance**, connecting heritage management with environmental policy, community participation and local decision-making. The proposed “Living Garden” requires cooperation between the museum, local authorities, residents, schools, NGOs and other community actors, showing how different stakeholders can contribute to the management and development of a shared public space.

**Adaptation:** Municipalities and cultural institutions can apply this model to other historic sites by establishing **participatory management structures** in which local communities are involved not only as users of the space but also in planning, decision-making and long-term management.

**Example Implementation:** A municipality and a heritage institution could establish a **local steering committee** involving museum representatives, residents, schools, NGOs, environmental organisations and local businesses. The committee could jointly discuss the design, activities, maintenance and future development of a community garden.

**Practical Step:** Create a **stakeholder map** identifying all organisations and community groups that should be involved and establish a regular consultation or co-management mechanism.

### Integrating heritage protection with environmental and urban policy

**Lesson:** The Butcher’s Bastion model demonstrates that **heritage conservation, environmental sustainability and urban development can be addressed together**. The proposed garden uses reversible, non-invasive interventions, allowing ecological and community activities to take place while respecting the archaeological and architectural value of the site.

**Adaptation:** Local authorities can include heritage sites in broader strategies for **urban greening, biodiversity, climate adaptation and community development,**provided that all interventions comply with heritage-protection requirements.

**Example Implementation:** A municipality could include suitable historic courtyards, fortifications or museum spaces in a local urban-greening programme, with interventions designed jointly by environmental and heritage specialists.

**Practical Step:** Develop a **joint heritage–environment assessment** before introducing any community-gardening intervention, clearly identifying protected elements and acceptable forms of intervention.

### Participatory decision-making and community ownership

**Lesson:** The proposed “Living Garden” shows that public spaces can be managed through **shared responsibility rather than exclusively top-down decision-making**. Activities such as “Adopt a Bed”, seed exchanges and community events provide mechanisms through which residents can actively contribute to the use and care of the space.

**Adaptation:** Other municipalities can introduce participatory mechanisms that allow residents to influence how community gardens and heritage spaces are used and managed.

**Example Implementation:** Residents and community organisations could participate in decisions concerning planting, activities, maintenance, educational programmes and the organisation of seasonal events.

**Practical Step:** Organise a **participatory consultation workshop** where residents and stakeholders identify priorities and agree on basic rules for the shared space.

### From pilot initiative to local policy

**Lesson:** The Butcher’s Bastion example demonstrates how a small-scale local initiative can provide a **practical testing ground for future public policy.** Rather than introducing a large programme immediately, municipalities can use a pilot community garden to test solutions, identify challenges, evaluate participation and gather evidence for future scaling.

**Adaptation:** Other local authorities can use pilot heritage-garden projects to inform policies concerning**urban green spaces, community participation, cultural heritage and sustainable development.**

**Example Implementation:** A municipality establishes one pilot “Living Garden”, monitors its environmental and social results for a defined period and subsequently develops recommendations for similar sites.

**Practical Step:** Create a **pilot monitoring framework** covering participation, partnerships, environmental outcomes, educational activities and management challenges, and use the results to formulate policy recommendations.

### Multi-stakeholder governance for long-term sustainability

**Lesson:**The proposed model shows that the long-term success of a community garden in a heritage site depends on **clear cooperation and shared responsibilities between different stakeholders.** The source specifically proposes a co-management committee involving relevant institutions and community actors.

**Adaptation:** Other heritage sites can develop similar governance arrangements, ensuring that responsibility does not fall exclusively on the museum, municipality or a single community organisation.

**Example Implementation:** A co-management agreement can establish who is responsible for: heritage protection, garden maintenance, water management, composting, community activities, educational programmes, monitoring and reporting.

**Practical Step:** Prepare a **co-management agreement** that clearly defines stakeholder roles, responsibilities, decision-making procedures and mechanisms for resolving conflicts.

![](https://becom4.eu/wp-content/uploads/word-image-2989-10.jpeg)

# Economy

The Butcher’s Bastion example demonstrates that a community garden can generate **economic and local value beyond direct food production**. The model shows that heritage spaces can contribute to the local economy when they are activated through community-based and sustainable activities.

### Community gardening as a source of local value and circular economic opportunities

**Lesson:** By connecting the heritage site with the neighbouring market, local artisans, community organisations and educational activities, the proposed “Living Garden” can create a network of local relationships that supports the circulation of resources, knowledge and opportunities.

**Adaptation:** Other heritage sites can develop community gardens as platforms for **local partnerships, small-scale production, traditional crafts, cultural activities and sustainable tourism**, while ensuring that economic activities remain compatible with heritage protection.

**Example Implementation:** A heritage garden could collaborate with local artisans, market vendors and community organisations to organise seasonal events, gardening workshops, craft demonstrations and small exhibitions connected with local plants, food and traditions.

**Practical Step:** Identify **local businesses, artisans, producers and community organisations**that could contribute products, services, knowledge or materials to the garden initiative and create a simple partnership map.

### Circular economy through local organic resources

**Lesson:** The Butcher’s Bastion model demonstrates how community gardening can contribute to a **local circular economy**by transforming organic residues into useful resources. The proposed composting system could connect the garden with organic material generated by the neighbouring market, reducing waste while producing compost for the garden.

**Adaptation:** Other community gardens can establish partnerships with nearby markets, restaurants, cafés or households to collect suitable organic residues and return them to the local production cycle.

**Example Implementation:** A community garden establishes a composting system and collaborates with nearby market vendors to collect suitable plant-based organic waste.

**Practical Step:** Map **local sources of organic waste** and identify one potential partner for a small-scale composting pilot.

### Connecting community gardening with local crafts and cultural production

**Lesson:** The proposed garden creates opportunities to connect plants with **traditional crafts and local cultural knowledge**. For example, plants used for natural dyes can support weaving and craft activities associated with the museum, creating a connection between environmental resources, cultural heritage and local creative practices.

**Adaptation:**Other heritage gardens can identify local plants, foods or materials that have a relationship with traditional crafts and develop activities around them.

**Example Implementation:**A garden cultivates plants suitable for natural dyes and works with local artisans to demonstrate traditional dyeing and textile techniques during community events.

**Practical Step:** Identify **local craftspeople and traditional practices** that could be connected with the garden and develop one pilot workshop.

### Heritage sites as platforms for local economic activity

**Lesson:** The Butcher’s Bastion demonstrates that activating a heritage site with community and environmental activities can increase its **social, cultural and economic attractiveness**. A living garden can complement exhibitions and cultural activities by giving visitors additional reasons to engage with the site and with local products, knowledge and traditions.

**Adaptation:** Museums and municipalities can integrate community gardens into broader cultural and sustainable-tourism programmes, creating opportunities for local organisations and producers to participate.

**Example Implementation:** A heritage site organises a seasonal **“Living Heritage Garden Day”,** combining gardening demonstrations, local crafts, educational activities and locally produced goods.

**Practical Step:** Design a pilot community event that connects the heritage site with **at least three local economic or cultural actors.**

### Low-cost approaches to local economic development

**Lesson:** The proposed “Living Garden” shows that local value can be generated through **small-scale, modular and resource-efficient interventions**, rather than requiring large infrastructure investments. Raised beds, composting, rainwater harvesting and community participation can create multiple benefits using relatively simple resources.

**Adaptation:** Other communities can begin with a small pilot and progressively develop partnerships, activities and economic opportunities as participation grows.

**Example Implementation:** A municipality or cultural institution starts with several raised beds and a small community programme, then gradually adds workshops, local partnerships and seasonal events.

**Practical Step:** Prepare a **basic cost-and-resource plan** identifying what can be provided through existing resources, community contributions, partnerships and local sponsorship.

# Education

From an educational perspective, the community garden project at the Butcher’s Bastion affords a dynamic model for transforming static heritage sites into active, open-air learning environments.

### Community gardening as an experiential and place-based learning environment

**Lesson:** By introducing community gardening and permaculture practices into the historic setting, abstract concepts such as biodiversity, soil health, urban microclimates and circular economy can become practical, hands-on learning experiences. This approach connects **cultural heritage with environmental education** and allows learners to understand sustainability through direct experience.

**Adaptation:** Other museums, heritage sites and cultural institutions can integrate **place-based and experiential learning** into their programmes by using gardens, courtyards or other outdoor spaces as living laboratories.

**Example Implementation:** A historic site could establish several demonstration beds where students explore biodiversity, composting, water management and traditional plants while simultaneously learning about the history of the site.

**Practical Step:** Select **one environmental topic and one local-history topic** and design a practical activity that connects the two directly in the heritage site.

### Intergenerational learning and traditional ecological knowledge

**Lesson:** The proposed garden provides an opportunity for **intergenerational knowledge exchange,** connecting older residents and local craftspeople with children, young people and other learners. Traditional knowledge about plants, gardening, medicinal herbs, natural dyes and crafts can be transmitted through practical activities rather than remaining only as historical information.

**Adaptation:**
 Other heritage gardens can involve local knowledge holders as **mentors, workshop leaders and co-educators**, allowing traditional knowledge to become part of contemporary sustainability education.

**Example Implementation:** Older residents or local artisans could lead workshops where students learn about traditional plant uses, seed varieties or natural dyeing techniques.

**Practical Step:** Identify **local knowledge holders** and organise an intergenerational workshop connecting one traditional practice with one contemporary sustainability topic.

### Museums as hubs for lifelong and non-formal learning

**Lesson:** The Butcher’s Bastion demonstrates the potential for cultural institutions to extend their educational role beyond conventional exhibitions. A community garden can complement existing cultural activities with **hands-on workshops, environmental activities and informal learning opportunities.**

**Adaptation:** Museums and heritage institutions can develop regular educational programmes involving schools, universities, NGOs, community groups and the wider public.

**Example Implementation:** The site could host seasonal workshops on urban gardening, biodiversity, traditional crafts, composting or seed exchange alongside its existing cultural activities.

**Practical Step:** Create an **annual educational programme** containing activities for at least three different target groups, such as school students, families and adults.

### Learning through practical sustainability activities

**Lesson:** The garden allows learners to develop knowledge and practical skills through **learning by doing.** Activities such as growing plants, composting, observing biodiversity and exploring traditional plant uses can strengthen environmental awareness and encourage active participation.

**Adaptation:** Schools and educational organisations can use community gardens as practical environments for developing **green skills, teamwork and problem-solving abilities.**

**Example Implementation:** Students could manage a raised bed throughout one growing season, documenting plant development, water use, biodiversity observations and the lessons learned.

**Practical Step:** Create a **learning diary or observation sheet** that participants use throughout the gardening activity to record what they observe, do and learn.

### Heritage interpretation through plants and crafts

**Lesson:** The Butcher’s Bastion model creates opportunities to connect historical interpretation with **plants, traditional crafts and local practices.**The proposed use of plants associated with natural dyes provides an example of how visitors can experience cultural heritage through practical activities rather than only through written information or exhibitions.

**Adaptation:** Other heritage sites can identify plants, materials or traditional practices that are historically connected to their location and incorporate them into educational programmes.

**Example Implementation:** A heritage garden could cultivate plants historically used for food, medicine, dyes or crafts and develop interpretation panels and practical demonstrations around them.

**Practical Step:** Identify **three locally significant plants or traditional practices** and develop a short educational activity explaining their historical and contemporary relevance.

# Practical Steps for Implementation

Translating the community garden program at the Butcher’s Bastion from a conceptual framework into a fully functioning, heritage-compliant reality calls for a structured, phase-based implementation methodology. Replicating this model in historic sites, public courtyards, or underutilized municipal spaces requires careful coordination among public authorities, heritage experts, civil society, and residents. By following a transparent operational roadmap, project leaders can navigate compliance constraints, ensure financial efficiency, and secure deep community engagement from the outset.

- **Identify a suitable heritage site or historic courtyard** where community gardening could be introduced without compromising the cultural, architectural or archaeological value of the site.
- **Assess the heritage and environmental conditions** of the location, including protected elements, available space, sunlight, microclimate, water availability and existing surfaces.
- **Consult heritage specialists and local authorities at an early stage** to clarify the legal, conservation and administrative conditions for introducing gardening activities.
- **Map local stakeholders** including residents, museum or cultural institution staff, schools, NGOs, local artisans, businesses and community organisations.
- **Identify local residents and knowledge holders** with experience in gardening, traditional plants, crafts or other relevant practices.
- **Develop a participatory co-design process** involving future users, heritage specialists, environmental practitioners and local organisations.
- **Use reversible and non-invasive infrastructure**, such as raised wooden beds, vertical planting structures and mobile containers, particularly where archaeological layers must be protected.
- **Design accessible spaces** that allow older residents, people with reduced mobility, children and other community members to participate.
- **Start with a small pilot garden** before attempting to expand the model to other heritage sites or across the locality.
- **Include biodiversity-friendly planting**, particularly native, heirloom, aromatic and pollinator-supporting species appropriate to the local context.
- **Connect plants with local cultural heritage**, for example through traditional medicinal plants, food traditions, natural dyes or crafts.
- **Introduce circular practices**, particularly composting of suitable organic residues and responsible management of water and other resources.
- **Explore rainwater harvesting and efficient irrigation** where these systems are compatible with the heritage characteristics of the site.
- **Create basic rules** covering gardening methods, maintenance, accessibility, use of shared spaces, resource management and responsibilities.
- **Establish a co-management structure** involving the cultural institution, local authorities, residents, NGOs and other relevant stakeholders.
- **Develop educational activities** connecting gardening with local history, biodiversity, traditional knowledge, crafts and sustainability.
- **Organise intergenerational activities**, such as seed exchanges, gardening workshops and traditional-knowledge sessions involving older residents, artisans and younger participants.
- **Organise public and cultural events** such as seasonal gardening activities, community harvests, craft demonstrations and educational workshops.
- **Install simple educational and interpretative elements**, such as plant labels and information about the historical, ecological and cultural significance of the garden.
- **Document the process and results** through photographs, participation data, stories, environmental observations and educational outcomes.
- **Evaluate the pilot** from environmental, social, political, economic and educational perspectives.
- **Use the evidence and community feedback to improve the model** and identify which elements can be transferred to other heritage sites.
- **Create partnerships** with schools, museums, NGOs, universities, local artisans, businesses and public authorities.
- **Develop a sustainable management and funding model** covering maintenance, materials, educational activities and long-term community participation before scaling the initiative.

# Transferability

The Butcher’s Bastion “Living Garden” model is transferable to:

- municipalities seeking to combine heritage conservation with urban greening;
- historic centres and protected heritage sites with underused courtyards or public spaces;
- museums and cultural institutions interested in developing living heritage experiences;
- neighbourhoods with limited access to green spaces;
- community groups and environmental NGOs promoting community gardening and biodiversity;
- schools and adult education organisations seeking outdoor, place-based learning environments;
- universities and research institutions working on heritage, sustainability, urban ecology and community participation;
- social organisations working on inclusion, intergenerational exchange and community wellbeing;
- local authorities developing participatory urban-greening and heritage policies;
- organisations promoting circular economy practices, such as composting and rainwater harvesting;
- cultural organisations and artisans interested in connecting traditional knowledge, plants and crafts;
- communities seeking opportunities for intergenerational learning and local knowledge transmission.

The model is particularly suitable for places where there are historic buildings or cultural sites, underused courtyards or urban spaces, local communities willing to participate, and institutions able to coordinate heritage protection with environmental and educational activities. The Butcher’s Bastion example is especially relevant where conventional ground-based gardening may be restricted by archaeological or heritage considerations, as the proposed model relies on low-impact and reversible interventions such as raised beds and vertical planting.

However, transfer should focus on the principles and process rather than copying the physical design of the Butcher’s Bastion. Each locality should adapt the model according to its heritage status, archaeological conditions, legal framework, available space, environmental characteristics, community needs, stakeholder structure and financial resources.

The most important lesson from the Butcher’s Bastion is that a community garden in a heritage site can become much more than a place for growing plants. A heritage community garden can be:

- an environmental solution supporting biodiversity and resource efficiency;
- a social meeting place promoting participation and intergenerational exchange;
- a participatory governance tool connecting residents, institutions and local authorities;
- a generator of local value through crafts, cultural activities and circular practices;
- an outdoor learning environment connecting heritage, nature and sustainability education;
- a living interpretation of cultural heritage, where traditional knowledge and practices can be experienced rather than simply displayed.

The Butcher’s Bastion demonstrates how a small-scale, heritage-based initiative can connect environmental sustainability, social participation, local culture, education and community governance, creating a model that can be adapted to other historic and urban contexts.

### Disclaimer / Copyright Notice

*Parts of this material were created and structured with the support of AI research tools. The content was created to support analysis and reporting and was adapted and reviewed by the project team.*

*All trademarks and product names mentioned are acknowledged and remain the property of their respective owners.*